Returning to Church
| Date Posted: 06/30/2001 11:51 AM Posted By: sweetpea Well, some background - |
| Date Posted: 06/30/2001 12:25 PM Posted By: Dathon Rank: sum, ergo cogito? Well it depends largely on the tone and culture of the ward you will be attending and how you respond to it. It is hypothetically possible that you could attend meetings and simply smile and decline invitations to bishop interviews. However in my experience most bishops want a one on one chat to get acquainted. If your bishop is an understanding and tolerant fellow he may accept that you want to attend but don't necessarily want a TR, or callings and he may let you be. OTOH he could try to cajole you into increased activity or he could try strong arm tactics and guilt trips. People can be unpredictable and vary a great deal. |
| Date Posted: 07/01/2001 12:15 AM Posted By: sweetpea Reply to:Dathon |
| Date Posted: 07/01/2001 9:19 PM Posted By: LDSman Rank: Server & Host Reply to:sweetpea |
| Date Posted: 07/02/2001 10:21 AM Posted By: sweetpea Thank you for the welcome! I was thinking about this over the weekend and agree that the less said the better! I was also wondering what my purpose would be to go in light of my absolute disbelief,- and can only say it would be social, so, in that light, it would be best to feel it out quietly with my mouth shut - although they would know immediately I am inactive and not a zealot(my direct neighbors behind me are LDS and know my kids are out playing on sunday-news will spread)but if they are open to me and don't attempt to snub us because of our "liberal" activities, then it might work out. If I notice a definate snubbing then we just won't bother - I had forgotten how wards can vary because I was blessed with such a great ward prior to my leaving - I just got completely overwhelmed and did some soul searching - |
| Date Posted: 07/03/2001 9:05 PM Posted By: Rod-Surly This is regarding your concerns about the required declarations of faith. About the only time you are required to answer such questions are when you are in a temple recommend interview. The instructions to the interviewer are essentially "Stick to the questions!" The questions themselves are, IMHO, constructed so as to allow the person being interviewed the widest latitude in answering simply "yes" or "no" to the questions in the context of their own beliefs. I believe the questions are phrased to allow the intellectuals in the church to answer the questions and still sleep at night. Some of the questions are simply about loyality. I sustain Gordon B. Hinkley as the Prophet, Seer, and Revelator and the only person on earth authorized to administer the keys of the priesthood. I understand the terms Prophet, Seer, and Revelator as ecclesiastical offices within the church. I recognize the prophet as the chief operating officer of the church. Supporting him is a matter of loyality. To some I am being totally dishonest. To me, I am doing what I need to do to keep peace in my marriage and retain some degree of sanity. I hope this is helpful in some way. |
| Date Posted: 07/03/2001 11:15 PM Posted By: sweetpea Well it helps, but doesnt make it any easier to do. Last time I was pulled into the bishops office I was asked about the prophet - my bishop was great and I paused and said, well, I do believe he is a man of God and is here to help us gain a closer relationship with Him - he smiled and said'good enough for me' so I guess I passed. I am hoping I can evade the question like that again. If I can't isn't there a way I could say that I am just not sure - still trying to gain a testimony, but want to be here(church) in order to ensure I don't lose that possibility? Can gain a testimony inactive - so I go, live like a liberal /closet coffee drinker take the kids - smile alot and be very pleasant and helpfull - pay as much tithing as I can afford and maybe they will just look the other way when they come over and see the bottle of wine on the counter(I will say I use it to cook with)I never wanted to go to the temple anyway. |
| Date Posted: 07/04/2001 9:09 AM Posted By: Rod-Surly Sweetpea, what a novel idea to just tell the truth :-) I think your response of "I'm just not sure" is as honest and humble as it gets. I admire your integrity. If I get brave enough, I'll try it next time I'm in that situation. Thanks for the idea! - Rod Surly |
| Date Posted: 07/04/2001 12:36 PM Posted By: sweetpea I am banking on the concept that we all have varying degrees of faith and as long as I am 'trying' to gain a testimony then they wont be too hard on me - I know I'll never have one of the actual truth and divineness of the gospel, but I am comfortable with my current beliefs and there is no reason to rock the boat - my testimony lies in the greatness of the organization and its people. The rest will just be me skirting the issues and walking on eggshells - |
| Date Posted: 07/11/2001 11:39 AM Posted By: gracie Rank: Ms. Understood Reply to : sweetpea
Sweetpea, they will make you feel very welcome. In my experience, they adore people who are trying to work it out. It's their job to help you. As long as you feel that way, I think both you and your leadership people will have a good relationship. No one's going to give you a really hard time about WoW issues unless you are abusing, and that doesn't sound like you. If the Mormon church is the best place for you to figure this out, then go ahead. To me, it would be like trying to diet in a chocolate shop. I see it as a dysfunctional organization that hurts me, whether it means to or not. I would not feel I could move on and learn about my true beliefs while being bombarded with their untruths. |
| Date Posted: 07/11/2001 8:09 PM Posted By: sweetpea1 Reply to : gracie |
| Date Posted: 07/11/2001 8:35 PM Posted By: John* |
| Date Posted: 07/11/2001 8:49 PM Posted By: gracie Rank: Ms. Understood Reply to : sweetpea1 |
| Date Posted: 07/11/2001 11:47 PM Posted By: sweetpea1 Reply to : gracie |
| Date Posted: 07/12/2001 12:00 AM Posted By: gracie Rank: Ms. Understood Hey Sweetpea, |
| Date Posted: 07/12/2001 1:01 AM Posted By: sweetpea1 Reply to : gracie |
| Date Posted: 07/12/2001 8:58 AM Posted By: gracie Rank: Ms. Understood Reply to : sweetpea1
Sweetpea, My mom was like that, only in her day Mormon women who had married outside the church were not allowed to get their own endowments, no matter what. She wanted to go to the temple for years before they changed the policy back in the mid-80's and let her go. My dad had to agree to not bugging her about the garments, etc. I myself made her the temple dress (it was purdy!), but at that time I was not endowed, so I didn't go with her. She worked so hard to get there that I think she must have a blind spot for how bizarre it is. Now she goes at least once a month and usually stays for two to three sessions. It upsets me that she wastes her time and energy this way. I'd rather she came and stayed with me for the day (I live in the same vicinity as the temple--three or so hours from her home). Often I will call up their house and my dad will answer and say "Mom's up there where you are." And I had no idea she was even in the area. I don't understand how it is more important to her to attend that ridiculous ceremony than to visit her grandchildren. About paying tithing, which you mentioned somewhere else. Why do you pay partial tithing? Believe me, I am not criticizing you. I just want to understand. Tithing is such a strict thing. I can only understand paying it if you wholeheartedly want to support the church and you're trying to get a temple recommend. Why drink coffee to keep out of the temple? It's much cheaper to stop paying tithing! And sooner or later you're going to get a bishop who won't deny you a recommend just because you have an occasional cup! That happened to me, I had an occasional something-else-that-I-won't-mention, and he thought that was just fine and sent me off to be endowed. It might be a good thing for you to go, anyway. Maybe it will make some sense to you. It never did to me. In my case, going to the temple was my ticket out for good, though it took me a looooong time to figure it out. Best wishes, Gracie |
| Date Posted: 07/12/2001 9:30 AM Posted By: sweetpea1 Reply to : gracie |
| Date Posted: 07/12/2001 11:19 AM Posted By: Anonymous gracieReply to : sweetpea1 Sweetpea, LOL! You're so right about her reasons for going I think! It makes me think I might just like it too sometimes. My almost-three-year-old is driving me batty today... She is painting a very accurate picture of why lots of people enjoy it there. I always found the celestial room a great relief because that bizarre ceremony was over. It IS a reward for enduring! But in busier temples they discourage you from hanging out too long. I also loved sitting there in the whispering quiet. I spent a lot of time there trying to make sense of it all. To no avail! Are you considering going? What are your transgressions, apart from coffee, if you don't mind sharing? I think they would absolutely let you if you were determined to go, unless you were an adulterer. You'd have to lie about supporting the prophet, etc., but I am sure that's a common practice. As long as your motives are pure, i.e., you are seeking enlightenment, I see no ethical problem in lying about that. I want to encourage you to pursue this next step, no matter what it is, even though I honestly believe the temple is a joke and the whole process is a method for extracting large sums of money from the members. I need to be up front with you about my beliefs. But I do think it's important for you to follow your own path and make up your own mind. I still don't get the partial tithing. Do you just feel a need to contribute because you like the organization? Why not put the $ in fast offerings or bring lots of treats to ward parties? Tithing money does not go to your home ward and is used for top churchmen's salaries and buildings, mostly. To me the only reasons to pay is for admission to the temple. Do you believe you get blessings for paying it? Do tell. I'm enjoying this discussion. Hope you don't mind sharing. Gracie |
| Date Posted: 07/12/2001 11:43 AM Posted By: gracie Rank: Ms. Understood |
| Date Posted: 07/12/2001 5:20 PM Posted By: sweetpea1 Reply to : gracie |
| Date Posted: 07/14/2001 12:02 PM Posted By: gracie Rank: Ms. Understood Reply to : sweetpea1 |
| Date Posted: 07/14/2001 9:27 PM Posted By: sweetpea1 Reply to : gracie |